Get the goods

Risky behaviors don’t exist in a vacuum. When they stack up in the same people or roles, they become toxic. Fix those overlaps first.

Precision-targeted security campaigns outperform generic ones by focusing on relevance, speed, and evidence, driving faster behavior change and measurable reductions in human risk.

Vanity metrics hide real exposure. Measuring actual security behaviors—and how fast and how long they change—reveals whether organizations are truly reducing human risk.

Toxic risk combinations reveal where human behaviors overlap to amplify exposure, showing security teams exactly where focused remediation delivers the greatest reduction in real-world risk.

Analysis of real-world AI usage shows which teams upload sensitive data, what they share, and why visibility into AI usage is now central to managing human risk.

The behavior decay interval shows whether security behavior change lasts, revealing when improvements fade and why relevance, clarity, and ongoing monitoring matter more than one-time wins.